The firm’s latest “Real Estate Counselor” column in the Miami Herald is authored by shareholder Nicole R. Kurtz and appears in today’s edition of the newspaper. The article, which is titled “Community Association Disputes? Here’s How to Minimize and Avoid Them,” focuses on the most common types of association clashes, the damage they can do, and some of the best approaches for associations to steer clear of them. It reads:
. . . [F]or most communities to realize the benefits that stem from effective association oversight, some disputes are inevitably bound to arise from time to time. Some of the most typical association clashes involve:
- Matters arising from compliance with state laws and municipal regulations;
- Financial issues, including collections, special assessments and reserves;
- Rule enforcement, including violations, suspensions and fines;
- Architectural review applications and decisions;
- Amendments to governing documents;
- Maintenance of community amenities, and rules governing their use;
- A perceived lack of transparency, including ineffective communications of association rules, changes and operational procedures to owners and residents;
- Seemingly inadequate responses to residents’ concerns and complaints;
- Meetings and their discussions, agendas and notices;
- Devising, implementing and enforcing new rules and restrictions;
- Renovations and alterations to the common elements or common areas;
- Maintenance of the common elements and areas;
- Board of director election irregularities and concerns;
- Vendor contracts.
The most effective community association boards of directors understand their business decisions will inevitably lead to disputes from time to time, but they should seek to avoid perceived minor or frivolous disputes whenever possible. They should also try to minimize or avoid significant disputes that may negatively impact the association’s operations and sow discord within the community.